HIGH RISK WARNING
This strategy involves naked options with theoretically unlimited loss potential. A single adverse move can result in losses exceeding your entire premium collected for months. This is NOT suitable for:
- Beginners
- Accounts under $50,000
- Anyone who can’t monitor positions intraday
- Anyone who doesn’t fully understand gamma and margin risk
If you’re new to options, start with Iron Condors or Cash Secured Puts instead.
Why This Strategy Exists: The Volatility Risk Premium #
Before I explain execution, you need to understand WHY selling short-dated puts has positive expected value.
The Volatility Risk Premium (VRP)
Since 1990, Implied Volatility (IV) has exceeded Realized Volatility (RV) by 4-6% on average. In January 2026:
- VIX (IV proxy): ~15-16%
- Realized Volatility: ~9-10%
- VRP Edge: ~5-6%
This means options are systematically overpriced. People pay too much for insurance. When I sell puts, I’m capturing this premium. Over thousands of trades, this edge compounds—but individual trades can and will go against me catastrophically.
Why 0DTE Specifically? #
| Factor | 0DTE Advantage | 0DTE Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Theta Decay | 50-80% decay by midday | Must be right TODAY |
| Vega Exposure | Minimal (no time for IV to matter) | Gamma accelerates losses |
| Trade Frequency | 250+ opportunities/year | More chances to hit bad day |
| Premium per Trade | Small ($50-150 typical) | Adds up with consistency |
| Overnight Risk | None (expires same day) | Intraday gaps still hurt |
The Central Limit Theorem works in my favor: individual trades have negative skew (-2 to -3), but aggregated over hundreds of trades, monthly returns normalize (skew approaches 0). However, this assumes trades are independent—news events and market gaps violate this assumption.
Account Requirements: What You Need Before Starting #
Recommended Broker: Interactive Brokers (IBKR) #
I use IBKR exclusively for this strategy. Here’s why:
| Requirement | IBKR Specification |
|---|---|
| Platform | Trader Workstation (TWS) |
| Account Type | Margin account (minimum) |
| Options Level | Level 4+ (naked options approval) |
| SPX Access | SPXW weeklies (CBOE) |
| Commissions | ~$0.65/contract |
| Data Feed | Real-time SPX/VIX quotes required |
Why IBKR?
- Lowest margin requirements with Portfolio Margin
- Best SPX/SPXW liquidity access
- Real-time Greeks and probability calculators
- Section 1256 tax reporting (Form 6781)
class="flex px-4 py-3 rounded-md" style="background-color: #1e3a5f"
<span
class="pe-3 flex items-center" style="color: #60a5fa"
>
<span
style="color: #e2e8f0"
><strong>Alternative Brokers:</strong> Tastytrade (good for options), TD Ameritrade/Schwab (thinkorswim platform). Avoid Robinhood for this strategy—insufficient tools and margin handling.</span>
Understanding SPX Margin #
SPX options are cash-settled and European-style (no early assignment). Margin requirements depend on your account type:
| Account Type | Minimum Account | Margin Requirement | My Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reg T Margin | $25,000 | ~50% of notional | Insufficient for this strategy |
| Portfolio Margin | $110,000+ | ~15-25% of notional | Required for efficiency |
Portfolio Margin Example (0DTE Put):
SPX @ 6,940
Sell 6,650 put (4.2% OTM, delta 0.20)
Reg T BPR: ~$35,000-50,000 per contract
Portfolio Margin BPR: ~$1,500-3,000 per contract
With $100k account:
- Reg T: Can trade 2 contracts max
- Portfolio Margin: Can trade 30-50 contracts safelyCritical: Portfolio Margin amplifies BOTH returns AND losses. A 5% SPX drop can trigger margin calls even with far OTM strikes.
Minimum Capital for This Strategy #
| Portfolio Size | Viability | My Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Under $25k | ❌ Not viable | PDT rules, insufficient margin |
| $25k-$50k | ⚠️ Marginal | Very small position sizes only |
| $50k-$100k | ✅ Workable | Start here with conservative sizing |
| $100k-$250k | ✅ Optimal | Full strategy implementation |
| $250k+ | ✅ Scalable | Can diversify across strikes/expirations |
My $100k Portfolio Allocation for This Strategy:
| Allocation | Amount | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Naked 0DTE Puts | 50% ($50k) | Primary income engine |
| Cash Buffer | 20% ($20k) | Margin calls, drawdowns |
| Hedged Spreads | 30% ($30k) | Defined-risk positions |
Section 1256 Tax Treatment #
SPX options qualify for Section 1256 treatment under US tax law:
| Tax Aspect | Section 1256 Benefit |
|---|---|
| Rate Split | 60% Long-Term / 40% Short-Term |
| Effective Rate | ~26.8% (vs. 37% ordinary income) |
| Mark-to-Market | Positions marked at year-end |
| Loss Carryback | Can carry back 3 years |
| Reporting | Form 6781 |
Example Tax Savings:
$40,000 profit from 0DTE SPX puts
Without 1256: $40,000 × 37% = $14,800 tax
With 1256: $40,000 × 26.8% = $10,720 tax
Savings: $4,080/yearNote: This applies to US taxpayers. Consult a tax professional for your specific situation.
The Strategy: Step-by-Step Execution #
What I’m Trading #
Strategy Definition:
I sell far out-of-the-money SPX puts with 0-1 days to expiration, targeting:
- Delta: 0.10-0.30 (10-30% probability of finishing ITM)
- Distance OTM: 3-5% below current SPX price
- Premium: $0.50-$2.00 per contract ($50-$200)
- Win Rate: 70-85% of trades profitable
- Profit Target: 50-70% of premium collected
- Stop Loss: 1.5-2× premium collected
Daily Trading Routine (30-60 Minutes) #
graph TD
A[9:15 AM: Pre-Market Check] --> B{VIX < 25?}
B -->|No| C[Skip Today]
B -->|Yes| D{SPX Gap < 1%?}
D -->|No| C
D -->|Yes| E[9:45-10:00 AM: Scan Chain]
E --> F[Identify 0.15-0.25 Delta Puts]
F --> G[Check Bid-Ask Spread]
G --> H{Spread < $0.10?}
H -->|No| I[Wait or Widen Strike]
H -->|Yes| J[Enter Position]
J --> K[Set Alerts: 50% Profit, 2× Stop]
K --> L[Monitor Until 3:30 PM]
L --> M{50% Profit Hit?}
M -->|Yes| N[Close & Re-enter Tomorrow]
M -->|No| O{Stop Hit?}
O -->|Yes| P[Close at Loss]
O -->|No| Q{3:30 PM?}
Q -->|Yes| R[Let Expire or Close]
Q -->|No| L
style C fill:#842029,stroke:#ea868f,color:#f8d7da
style N fill:#0f5132,stroke:#75b798,color:#d1e7dd
style P fill:#842029,stroke:#ea868f,color:#f8d7da
Trade Execution: Detailed Examples #
Example 1: Naked Far-OTM 0DTE Put #
Market Conditions (January 19, 2026):
- SPX: 6,940
- VIX: 15.5 (low volatility—favorable)
- 50-day MA: 6,750 (SPX above—bullish)
- No FOMC/CPI in 48 hours
Position:
- Sell: 1 SPX 6,650 Put (0DTE)
- Delta: ~0.20 (20% ITM probability)
- Distance OTM: 4.2% below spot
- Premium: $0.65 ($65 per contract)
Position Greeks at Entry:
| Greek | Value | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| Delta | -0.20 | $20 loss per 1-point SPX drop |
| Gamma | -0.008 | Delta accelerates as SPX drops |
| Theta | +0.45 | Earning $45/day in time decay |
| Vega | -0.02 | $2 loss per 1% IV increase |
Key Insight: Theta is my friend, Gamma is my enemy. As expiration approaches, Gamma accelerates—small moves become big P/L swings.
Scenario Analysis:
| SPX at 4 PM | Put Value | P/L | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6,940 (unchanged) | $0.00 | +$65 | ✅ Max profit |
| 6,900 (-0.6%) | $0.00 | +$65 | ✅ Max profit |
| 6,750 (-2.7%) | $0.00 | +$65 | ✅ Max profit |
| 6,680 (-3.7%) | $0.00 | +$65 | ✅ Barely OTM |
| 6,650 (-4.2%) | $0.00 | +$65 | ✅ At strike, expires worthless |
| 6,600 (-4.9%) | $50.00 | -$4,935 | ❌ ITM, cash settlement |
| 6,500 (-6.3%) | $150.00 | -$14,935 | ❌ Deep ITM |
| 6,300 (-9.2%) | $350.00 | -$34,935 | ❌ Catastrophic |
class="flex px-4 py-3 rounded-md" style="background-color: #842029"
<span
class="pe-3 flex items-center" style="color: #ea868f"
>
<span class="relative block icon"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 512 512"><path fill="currentColor" d="M506.3 417l-213.3-364c-16.33-28-57.54-28-73.98 0l-213.2 364C-10.59 444.9 9.849 480 42.74 480h426.6C502.1 480 522.6 445 506.3 417zM232 168c0-13.25 10.75-24 24-24S280 154.8 280 168v128c0 13.25-10.75 24-23.1 24S232 309.3 232 296V168zM256 416c-17.36 0-31.44-14.08-31.44-31.44c0-17.36 14.07-31.44 31.44-31.44s31.44 14.08 31.44 31.44C287.4 401.9 273.4 416 256 416z"/></svg>
<span
style="color: #f8d7da"
><strong>The Risk:</strong> A 5% intraday drop (rare but possible) turns a $65 profit into a $5,000+ loss. This is why position sizing and stops are critical.</span>
Step-by-Step in IBKR TWS:
-
Open Option Chain:
- Symbol: SPX
- Expiration: Today (0DTE) or Tomorrow (1DTE)
- Filter: Puts only
-
Find Target Strike:
- Look for delta 0.15-0.25 range
- At SPX 6,940, this is approximately 6,600-6,700
- Check bid-ask spread (want < $0.10)
-
Enter Order:
- Action: SELL
- Quantity: 1 (start small)
- Order Type: LIMIT
- Price: Mid-point or slightly below
-
Set Management Orders:
- GTC Buy-to-Close at 50% profit ($0.32)
- Alert at 2× premium ($1.30)
-
Monitor:
- Check every 30-60 minutes
- Close by 3:30 PM if still open
Example 2: Hedged Credit Put Spread (Defined Risk) #
For 30% of my allocation, I use spreads instead of naked puts to cap maximum loss.
Position:
- Sell: 1 SPX 6,650 Put @ $0.65
- Buy: 1 SPX 6,500 Put @ $0.15 (the “wing”)
- Net Credit: $0.50 ($50 per spread)
- Width: 150 points ($15,000 max risk per spread)
Why Add the Wing?
- Caps maximum loss at $14,950 (width minus credit)
- Reduces margin requirement by 60-70%
- Still captures 75% of naked premium
- Survives black swan events
Naked vs. Spread Comparison:
| Metric | Naked Put | Credit Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Premium | $65 | $50 |
| Max Profit | $65 | $50 |
| Max Loss | Unlimited | $14,950 |
| BPR (Portfolio Margin) | ~$2,500 | ~$800 |
| Breakeven | 6,649.35 | 6,649.50 |
| Return on Capital | 2.6%/day | 6.25%/day |
The spread has better capital efficiency and defined risk, at the cost of $15/contract in premium.
My Decision Framework:
| Condition | My Choice |
|---|---|
| VIX < 18, stable market | Naked puts (50% allocation) |
| VIX 18-22, some uncertainty | Mix of naked + spreads |
| VIX > 22, elevated risk | Spreads only or skip |
| Major event within 48h | Skip entirely |
| Account drawdown > 5% | Spreads only until recovery |
Position Sizing: The Most Critical Factor #
Position Sizing Determines Survival
The #1 reason traders blow up with this strategy is over-sizing. One bad day can erase months of gains. My rules:
- Max risk per trade: 1-2% of portfolio
- Max daily exposure: 5-10% of portfolio
- Max concurrent positions: 3-5 contracts
- Cash buffer: Always maintain 20%+
Position Sizing Calculator #
For $100k Portfolio:
| Risk Tolerance | Max Loss/Trade | Contracts (Naked) | Contracts (Spread) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative (1%) | $1,000 | 1 | 1 |
| Moderate (2%) | $2,000 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Aggressive (3%) | $3,000 | 2-3 | 2 |
My Approach:
- Start each day with 1-2 contracts
- Add 1 more only if first position profitable
- Never exceed 3-5 total contracts
- Scale down after any losing day
Kelly Criterion Application #
The Kelly Criterion suggests optimal bet sizing:
Kelly % = (Win Rate × Avg Win - Loss Rate × Avg Loss) / Avg Loss
Example:
Win Rate: 80%
Avg Win: $50
Loss Rate: 20%
Avg Loss: $150
Kelly % = (0.80 × 50 - 0.20 × 150) / 150
Kelly % = (40 - 30) / 150 = 6.7%
Half-Kelly (safer): 3.3% per tradeI use quarter-Kelly (1.5-2%) because the actual loss distribution has fat tails that Kelly doesn’t account for.
Risk Management: Survival Rules #
Hard Rules I Never Break #
NON-NEGOTIABLE RULES
| Rule | Why |
|---|---|
| ❌ Never trade VIX > 25 | Gamma explosions, gap risk |
| ❌ Never hold through major events | FOMC, CPI, Jobs = unpredictable |
| ❌ Never add to losing positions | Averaging down = averaging into disaster |
| ❌ Never exceed 5% daily exposure | One bad day shouldn’t matter |
| ❌ Never remove stops | “It’ll come back” is how accounts die |
| ❌ Never trade first/last 15 min | Erratic pricing, wide spreads |
| ❌ Never trade after a loss without pause | Revenge trading destroys accounts |
Stop Loss Implementation #
My Stop Loss Rules:
| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Position at 1.5× premium | Alert, evaluate closing |
| Position at 2× premium | Close immediately |
| SPX within 1% of strike | Close regardless of P/L |
| VIX spikes > 5 points intraday | Close all positions |
| Down 3% on day | Stop trading, reassess |
Example:
- Collected $65 premium
- Stop at 2× = $130
- If put price reaches $1.30, close for -$65 loss
- Don’t wait for “recovery”
The “Circuit Breaker” System #
I have automatic rules that pause trading:
| Trigger | Action | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Single trade loses 3× premium | Pause trading | Rest of day |
| Daily P/L down 2% | Pause trading | Rest of day |
| Weekly P/L down 5% | Reduce size 50% | 1 week |
| Monthly P/L down 10% | Stop strategy | Reassess |
Expected Returns: Realistic Projections #
What’s Actually Achievable #
Current Environment (January 2026):
| Metric | Expectation |
|---|---|
| Daily Premium | $50-150 per contract |
| Win Rate | 80-85% |
| Avg Winner | $40-60 |
| Avg Loser | $100-200 |
| Monthly Return | 1.5-3% |
| Annual Return | 20-35% |
This is the sweet spot. Low VIX means:
- Smaller premiums but higher win rates
- Less gamma risk
- Easier position management
Moderate Environment:
| Metric | Expectation |
|---|---|
| Daily Premium | $100-300 per contract |
| Win Rate | 70-80% |
| Avg Winner | $75-150 |
| Avg Loser | $200-400 |
| Monthly Return | 1-2.5% |
| Annual Return | 15-30% |
Premiums are fatter but so are losses. More volatile day-to-day P/L.
Dangerous Environment:
| Metric | Expectation |
|---|---|
| Daily Premium | $200-500+ per contract |
| Win Rate | 60-70% |
| Avg Winner | $150-250 |
| Avg Loser | $500-1,500+ |
| Monthly Return | -5% to +5% (high variance) |
| Annual Return | Unpredictable |
class="flex px-4 py-3 rounded-md" style="background-color: #842029"
<span
class="pe-3 flex items-center" style="color: #ea868f"
>
<span class="relative block icon"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 512 512"><path fill="currentColor" d="M506.3 417l-213.3-364c-16.33-28-57.54-28-73.98 0l-213.2 364C-10.59 444.9 9.849 480 42.74 480h426.6C502.1 480 522.6 445 506.3 417zM232 168c0-13.25 10.75-24 24-24S280 154.8 280 168v128c0 13.25-10.75 24-23.1 24S232 309.3 232 296V168zM256 416c-17.36 0-31.44-14.08-31.44-31.44c0-17.36 14.07-31.44 31.44-31.44s31.44 14.08 31.44 31.44C287.4 401.9 273.4 416 256 416z"/></svg>
<span
style="color: #f8d7da"
><strong>I don’t trade this strategy when VIX > 25.</strong> The premium looks attractive but gamma risk makes it a losing proposition. Switch to defined-risk spreads or sit out entirely.</span>
Research Data (2010-2026):
| Source | Strategy | CAGR | Max DD | Sharpe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBOE PUT Index | Monthly ATM Puts | 9.5% | -32% | 0.65 |
| CBOE WPUT Index | Weekly ATM Puts | 7.8% | -28% | 0.58 |
| Spintwig | 0DTE 5% OTM | 15-25%* | -20%* | 0.7-0.9* |
| Academic Studies | Short Vol | 8-12% | -25-40% | 0.5-0.7 |
*With active management (50% profit target, stops)
Key Insight: The CBOE indices sell ATM puts mechanically. Far OTM with active management shows better risk-adjusted returns, but also requires more skill and time.
My $100k Portfolio Projection #
Reality Check: These curves assume no significant drawdowns. In practice, expect:
- 1-2 months per year with losses
- At least one 5-10% drawdown
- Recovery periods that slow compounding
Realistic Annual Expectation: $115k-$140k (15-40% return) with proper risk management.
Expert Perspectives #
I’ve studied how the world’s top traders view this strategy:
View: Sees merit in systematic short-vol for VRP capture, but naked 0DTE is “high-wire without a net.”
Key Insight: “Gamma risks demand dynamic hedging. For retail traders, defined-risk structures like iron condors deliver similar returns with capped downside.”
His Critique of This Strategy:
- Low beta to SPX hides tail exposure
- Add VVIX (vol-of-vol) to risk models—alpha drops to 3-4% after adjustment
- Citadel’s market-making desks profit from 0DTE flow, but they have infrastructure retail doesn’t
View: Appreciates event-driven edge (avoiding FOMC days), but warns 0DTE amplifies “nickel-picking before steamrollers.”
Key Insight: “The 2020 profits were partly luck—proper intraday hedging is essential. Scale to 20% portfolio max to avoid catastrophic blowups.”
His Critique:
- Alpha is real but eroded by costs (5-10% drag)
- Blend with long positions for 15-25% returns
- Don’t make this your only strategy
View: Reflexivity lens—VRP persists until overcrowding flips it.
Key Insight: “It’s like picking up nickels in front of a steamroller. The math looks good until it doesn’t.”
His Warning:
- 2018 Volmageddon, 2020 COVID crash wiped 0DTE sellers
- Retail boom in 0DTE (2024-2026) risks liquidity crunches
- Use as tactical overlay, not core strategy
- When everyone’s selling premium, stop selling premium
View: Quant pioneer affirms the math—CLT normalizes skew, VRP provides ~4% edge.
Key Insight: “Models show 10-15% sustainable for 0DTE vs. 8% for monthly puts. But luck vs. skill is hard to distinguish—small sample sizes plague backtests.”
His Recommendation:
- Size to Kelly fraction (2-5% per trade) or face >20% ruin risk
- The strategy is mathematically sound but execution determines outcomes
- Paper trade extensively before real capital
Consensus: Strong in theory (VRP alpha exists), but execution risks demand professional-level discipline. Most retail traders over-leverage and blow up.
When to Use This Strategy (and When to Avoid It) #
Ideal Conditions #
Trade This Strategy When:
| Condition | Check |
|---|---|
| VIX between 14-22 | ✅ |
| SPX above 50-day MA | ✅ |
| SPX above 200-day MA | ✅ |
| No major events in 48 hours | ✅ |
| VIX term structure in contango | ✅ |
| Account at full capital | ✅ |
| Mentally clear and focused | ✅ |
Avoid Conditions #
Skip This Strategy When:
| Condition | Why |
|---|---|
| VIX > 25 | Gamma explosions, unpredictable moves |
| VIX < 12 | Premiums too thin for the risk |
| FOMC/CPI/Jobs within 48h | Gap risk too high |
| Market down > 2% at open | Chasing falling knives |
| After a losing day | Revenge trading mindset |
| Tired, distracted, emotional | Poor decision-making |
| Account in drawdown > 10% | Need to recover first |
Decision Flowchart #
graph TD
A[Morning: Should I Trade?] --> B{VIX Level?}
B -->|VIX < 14| C[Skip: Premiums too thin]
B -->|VIX 14-22| D{Events in 48h?}
B -->|VIX > 25| E[Skip: Too risky]
D -->|Yes| F[Skip: Event risk]
D -->|No| G{SPX vs MAs?}
G -->|Below 50 MA| H[Skip or Reduce Size]
G -->|Above 50 MA| I{Account Status?}
I -->|In Drawdown| J[Spreads Only, Half Size]
I -->|At Full Capital| K[Normal Trading: 1-3 Contracts]
K --> L{Time of Day?}
L -->|Before 9:45 AM| M[Wait for Market to Settle]
L -->|9:45 AM - 3:30 PM| N[Execute Strategy]
L -->|After 3:30 PM| O[Close Positions or Let Expire]
style C fill:#842029,stroke:#ea868f,color:#f8d7da
style E fill:#842029,stroke:#ea868f,color:#f8d7da
style F fill:#842029,stroke:#ea868f,color:#f8d7da
style N fill:#0f5132,stroke:#75b798,color:#d1e7dd
Comparison: This Strategy vs. Alternatives #
| Factor | 0DTE Naked Puts | Iron Condors | CSPs on SPY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Return | 20-40% | 15-25% | 8-15% |
| Max Drawdown | -30-50%+ | -15-20% | -15-25% |
| Win Rate | 70-85% | 70-80% | 70-80% |
| Time Required | 30-60 min/day | 15 min/day | 5 min/week |
| Skill Required | Expert | Intermediate | Beginner |
| Account Minimum | $50k+ | $25k+ | $5k+ |
| Defined Risk | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| My Recommendation | Supplement only | Core strategy | Baseline |
My Portfolio Approach:
- 50% Iron Condors (core income, defined risk)
- 20% 0DTE SPX Puts (alpha supplement, higher risk)
- 15% CSPs on quality stocks (baseline income)
- 15% Cash buffer (protection and opportunities)
I never rely solely on 0DTE naked puts. They’re a supplement to a diversified options income portfolio.
Trade Logging Template #
Track every trade to improve over time:
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
0DTE SPX PUT TRADE LOG
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Date: ____________ Day: Mon / Tue / Wed / Thu / Fri
MARKET CONDITIONS
SPX at entry: $_______ VIX at entry: _______
SPX 50 MA: $_______ Events today: _______________
Gap at open: _______%
POSITION
Strike: $_______ Delta: _______
Premium collected: $_______
Contracts: _______
Total credit: $_______
BPR used: $_______
MANAGEMENT
50% profit target: $_______
Stop loss (2×): $_______
Time entered: _______
Time exited: _______
RESULT
Exit price: $_______
P/L: $_______ (____%)
Win / Loss / Scratch
NOTES
What worked: _________________________________
What didn't: _________________________________
Lesson learned: ______________________________
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════Key Takeaways #
Summary:
-
The Strategy Works - VRP provides a real edge. 0DTE accelerates theta capture.
-
But It’s Dangerous - Unlimited downside, gamma risk, margin calls. One bad day can erase months.
-
Requirements Are High - $50k+ minimum, Portfolio Margin preferred, IBKR recommended, expert-level skill needed.
-
Position Sizing Is Everything - 1-2% risk per trade max. Most blowups come from over-sizing.
-
Active Management Required - This isn’t set-and-forget. You must monitor intraday.
-
Use It as Supplement, Not Core - Combine with defined-risk strategies like Iron Condors.
-
Know When to Skip - VIX > 25, major events, personal stress = no trade.
Final Thoughts #
This strategy is the options equivalent of driving a race car. In the right hands, with the right conditions, it can deliver exceptional returns. But most people have no business being on that track.
If you’re considering this strategy, ask yourself:
- Can I afford to lose 20-30% in a single bad month?
- Do I have the discipline to follow stops religiously?
- Can I monitor positions throughout the trading day?
- Am I doing this because I understand the edge, or because I’m chasing returns?
For most traders, Iron Condors or Cash Secured Puts provide similar risk-adjusted returns with far less stress and tail risk.
If you proceed, start small. Paper trade first. Build the skill before you build the size.
Remember:
“The goal isn’t to maximize returns. It’s to stay in the game long enough for compounding to work.”
A blown-up account compounds at 0%. A consistent 15% beats a volatile 40% every time.
Related Resources #
- 📊 Iron Condor Strategy Guide - My #1 recommended strategy
- 💰 CSP Strategy Guide - Beginner-friendly alternative
- 📋 Top Options Strategies Ranked - Full strategy comparison
Disclaimer: This is educational content based on personal experience and research. Options trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Naked options strategies can result in losses exceeding your initial investment. The examples and projections are hypothetical and may not reflect actual trading results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always consult a qualified financial advisor before trading.
Sources: